Re: IB For/Next bug (I think)


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Signature.net Forum ]

Posted by Tom Fulton on March 04, 2008 at 04:35:54:

In Reply to: IB For/Next bug (I think) posted by Bob Pride on March 03, 2008 at 15:59:47:

Is X a 2.0 or a 3.0 variable? It's a memory flogger but I seem to recall something about FOR/NEXT falling down if the variable length did not allow for the added precision. I think the NEXT bumps always, so X wants to become 100 at the end. The FOR sees 100 is greater than the limit and bags. If X can't become 100 and instead becomes 0 because it's a 2.0 that's where the brainlock occurs.


Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

What is the name of the main Signature System's Product?

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

You may attach up to 5 files to your followup (see below):





Each file can be a maximum of 1MB in length Uploaded files will be purged from the server on a regular basis.


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Signature.net Forum ]