Re: Comet32 suggestions


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Signature.net Forum ]

Posted by Grant Foraker on March 09, 2011 at 15:50:53:

In Reply to: Re: Comet32 suggestions posted by Barbara Brazil on March 09, 2011 at 14:58:47:

Don't like the "1st" file concept. Too much unnecessary clutter. The old way was quicker and simpler. I want to see the warning, error, and stats. If all is well on the next source. Not go off hunting for a LST file.

Only times I do a full compile list is when I'm hunting an error for QERRLOG. I want it when I want it. Not all the time.

And, I periodically do mass recompiles. I want my customers to have fresh compiles at least once a year. 400-500 LST files for no reason seems like a waste of processor power. Having to load CometEx, sort by type, select the LST's, and then delete them is a pain.

I peridically run a DOS batch file to delete BAK, STS, PUI and DBG files. Junk that accumulates in C:\Comet folders. If the LST files were outside QDIR then they wouldn't bother me as much. And, I periodically do mass recompiles.


Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

What is the name of the main Signature System's Product?  

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

You may attach up to 5 files to your followup (see below):





Each file can be a maximum of 1MB in length Uploaded files will be purged from the server on a regular basis.


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Signature.net Forum ]