Re: Comet32.444 discrepancy

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Signature.net Forum ]

Posted by Grant Foraker on July 20, 2011 at 12:51:16:

In Reply to: Re: Comet32.444 discrepancy posted by Grant Foraker on July 20, 2011 at 10:31:55:

Only had 17 decompiled programs using XACCNUM1. XACCNUM1 was only used to validate $ fields that had to contain numeric values. Most were checking for 1.0, 2.0 and 3.0. One was for 9.2. All worked OK with the XACCNUM1 lines REM'd out.

This appears to be a MUST FIX for decompiled programs you want to migrate to Comet32 and compile.

Follow Ups:


Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

What is the name of the main Signature System's Product?  

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

You may attach up to 5 files to your followup (see below):





Each file can be a maximum of 1MB in length Uploaded files will be purged from the server on a regular basis.

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Signature.net Forum ]