Re: Comet32.444 discrepancy


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Signature.net Forum ]

Posted by Grant Foraker on July 22, 2011 at 06:20:32:

In Reply to: Re: Comet32.444 discrepancy posted by Keith Smith on July 20, 2011 at 22:23:17:

As you said, "attempted to run C16 apps expecting Comet32 to run it. Everything was screwed up with my apps", is where were at.

In Q days, had a county as a customer. Had to write property tax/bond programs that would multiply things like (12345.25 * .12345678) and come out right. Took a lot of playing around with 16.0 and 16.8 fields to get acceptable accuracy.

Anything that doesn't work the same in Comet32 has to be pointed out to the forum. Whether SIG decides to change Comet is a separate issue.


Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

What is the name of the main Signature System's Product?  

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

You may attach up to 5 files to your followup (see below):





Each file can be a maximum of 1MB in length Uploaded files will be purged from the server on a regular basis.


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Signature.net Forum ]