Re: Comet32 vs IDMAINT


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Signature.net Forum ]

Posted by Robert G Laurin on January 05, 2012 at 09:31:08:

In Reply to: Re: Comet32 vs IDMAINT posted by Jim Guerber on January 05, 2012 at 08:09:51:

Yes I use IDMAINT - a lot!

With the include list, the exclude list is redundant and serves only to satisfy our paranoia of ex-employees.

Yes one-time passwords are required. You never know if and when a user will finally authorize its computer. I do close the Outer Door whenever no one new is expected.

The Backdoor password also saved my neck a few times.

If I can start a wish list...
- Track user's IPs
- Track user's last connection (handy to get rid of inactive accounts or when someone has many IDs because they reformat every few months)
- Track user's connections (IP/Time-in/Time-out) with reporting capabilities.
- Allow Partition Status and QIPL to display connected user's ID, IP and connection time.
- Allow IP filtering per user (Static/Range/All).
- Allow for Time Period (Inclulde/Exclude/Auto-Disconnect)
- Allow configuration of MAXSESSIONS directly in IDMAINT per user ID
- Upon disconnect, kill partition & reset DABs to configured default.

More to come, I'm sure


Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

What is the name of the main Signature System's Product?  

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

You may attach up to 5 files to your followup (see below):





Each file can be a maximum of 1MB in length Uploaded files will be purged from the server on a regular basis.


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Signature.net Forum ]