Re: MTB NUM FUNCTION


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Signature.net Forum ]

Posted by Jim Guerber on October 01, 2004 at 13:43:41:

In Reply to: MTB NUM FUNCTION posted by Bruce Jordan on October 01, 2004 at 11:34:53:

Maybe we should put into the language a statement such as:

precision 16.2

or something.

This would have to be recognized by both the system and the compiler.

How about larger numbers/precision?

length 543.32 & local bignum

??




Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

What is the name of the main Signature System's Product?

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

You may attach up to 5 files to your followup (see below):






[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Signature.net Forum ]