Re: CFAM Security


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Signature.net Forum ]

Posted by Jon Sacks (168.100.250.106) on December 08, 2004 at 13:12:19:

In Reply to: CFAM Security posted by Jim Guerber on December 05, 2004 at 16:58:41:

It is the responsibility of the firewall. But why would anyone ever use a routable address for a server internally? That is just insane. The proper way is to have a the firewall direct (proxy) the request to the server and do it's proper screening.


Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

What is the name of the main Signature System's Product?

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

You may attach up to 5 files to your followup (see below):






[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Signature.net Forum ]