Posted by Jon Sacks on July 08, 2005 at 07:49:13:
I am still concerned about performance moving to the 100% CFAM model. I did testing on a system that is configured with both S, C (Local) and C (CFAM Server via Comet32, same server as the S type) directories and got the following results. Using TEST4, we see marginal degridation on the 100x10 test but significant hit on the 100x10 and 100x100 we see large hits (over 30%)
Comet CFAM Base line statistics
100x10 1000x10 100x100
CFAM Local Directory 0.85 2.91 7.03
CometSrv "S" Directory 1.00 8.08 9.88
CFAM Network Directory 1.00 11.03 13.20
How does this compare to other peoples experiance, could there be some impact of the server running both S and C directories?
JSACKS<<