Re: NETINQ question


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Signature.net Forum ]

Posted by Barbara Brazil on September 07, 2005 at 10:46:16:

In Reply to: Re: NETINQ question posted by Grant Foraker on September 07, 2005 at 06:37:56:

Grant:

My guess is the confusion is coming from $(CATEMP). It's a type "C" but I'll bet it's path doesn't start with \\PAL00. Remember that to support the local type "C" you have CFAM and CFileSrv running there.

The reason you're not seeing a second server name is that it's trying to extract the name by looking for "\\" and not finding it, thus coming up with an empty name. I agree, NETINQ needs a better way to deal with local servers.

bb


Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

What is the name of the main Signature System's Product?

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

You may attach up to 5 files to your followup (see below):






[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Signature.net Forum ]