Re: QSPOOL


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Signature.net Forum ]

Posted by Keith Smith on July 13, 2009 at 21:51:15:

In Reply to: QSPOOL posted by Grant Foraker on July 13, 2009 at 08:08:32:

Grant: One thing I've learned from the past is that you NEVER take away an ability to do something that's been around and accepted by the user base for years. Call that luggage. Take that away and you'll generate problems! Comet and QSPOOL have been around since the mid-80's. If Sig wants to replace QSPOOL, than it must make DOCMGR superior!! Faster, better, easier!! Read my Net Book post. Hardware cheaper than software? The last thing client accounts want is to increase the software cost per user. QSPOOL comes with Comet per work station at no extra cost. Clients would need to make an additional investment for DOCMGR per work station, plus training and program mods, (I can't do this as a free-bee). From a client's point of view "Why would I want to spend more for less?). Sig has to make this cheaper. Google and Open-Source use the FREE option.


Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

What is the name of the main Signature System's Product?  

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

You may attach up to 5 files to your followup (see below):





Each file can be a maximum of 1MB in length Uploaded files will be purged from the server on a regular basis.


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Signature.net Forum ]