Re: didn't think KEYCHK (QTILITY #18 / QTIL905) should fail with NLM error in ke


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Signature.net Forum ]

Posted by Bob A on November 12, 2013 at 13:42:45:

In Reply to: Re: didn't think KEYCHK (QTILITY #18 / QTIL905) should fail with NLM error in ke posted by Barbara Brazil on November 12, 2013 at 13:30:01:

THanx for the pointer to the QTIL905 source...

just upgraded to 476 last thursday/friday and then his started

however... this file has only one index (I00).... but it is extended key (embedded in the file itself)

I was running QTILITY's KEYCHK because I wanted to run overnight and get the lising in the morning.... maybe I'll try to run key checking (a/k/a whatever it's called in COMETEX) to see if I get different results.

still can't see why KEYCHK should fail with a key error.... dunno!

just want to get the 476 removed as an issue since I want to upgrade my PROD server to the same level.

Thanx

Bob "A"


Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

What is the name of the main Signature System's Product?  

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

You may attach up to 5 files to your followup (see below):





Each file can be a maximum of 1MB in length Uploaded files will be purged from the server on a regular basis.


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Signature.net Forum ]