Re: NOEXCP vs AGAIN


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Signature.net Forum ]

Posted by Robert G Laurin on August 27, 2018 at 14:08:01:

In Reply to: Re: NOEXCP vs AGAIN posted by Barbara Brazil on August 27, 2018 at 12:52:50:

Barb said: "It DOES NOT ignore the error as I think you are expecting."

Well, I wish it didn't.

The whole purpose of something like a NOEXCP statement is saying: I don't want an error and I really don't care about it - so just ignore it.

Which would make a lot of sense. If I really cared for this EXCP, I'd set my own trap.

It makes using and processing SNAPSHOT in a EXCP=33 loop extremely difficult. I would like my Master Processing program to be able to say: "User JOHN DOE on Node COMETXX is holding customer record ABC123" in real time.

I recently witness a record being held from 10am to 2pm on her "third screen". That held noon-time processes for a long time. I also saw a record being help from Friday 3pm to Monday 8:15.... There goes week-end processing...

I am in the process of implementing a routine that would report these and also allow processing to skip this record after so many retries.

So doing an AGAIN without using AGAIN is very tricky !



Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

What is the name of the main Signature System's Product?  

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

You may attach up to 5 files to your followup (see below):





Each file can be a maximum of 1MB in length Uploaded files will be purged from the server on a regular basis.


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Signature.net Forum ]